- #ROUTER LATENCY PROBLEMS COMCAST PINGPLOTTER CODE#
- #ROUTER LATENCY PROBLEMS COMCAST PINGPLOTTER FREE#
I have no idea when it happens, but it has happened at any time throughout the day. Is working reliably without weird dropouts.As of a few weeks ago, I've started experiencing an issue where when playing online games, I'll experience extreme lag up to a few seconds at a time. This triggers a new HTTP connection, but also validates that your DNS IP (incidentally always the same one) for every hostname you ask for. The hostname happens to be in a domain that returns a valid Generate a pseudorandom hostname for each test and looks it
#ROUTER LATENCY PROBLEMS COMCAST PINGPLOTTER CODE#
Instead of apenwarr.ca, the code tries a bunch of sites from : There is a hard-coded list of RFC 1918 addresses that are commonly used as routers that the program tries first to see if they are faster than. F1 is really an incredible technical feat in more ways than just the cars. Sure there's the pit crew, but there's a whole team back home who are watching and analysing data and relaying advice. There's a great example with NTT's partnership with Formula 1 where NTT engineers go in before race day to location making sure all that incredible Digital Twin data is getting fed back-to-base to manufacturer's HQs in the UK or Germany etc.
#ROUTER LATENCY PROBLEMS COMCAST PINGPLOTTER FREE#
* this is complicated, someone feel free to correct/expand but essentially carriers will lease capacity over particular connections and sometimes the agreements between two carriers will mean particular customers traffic may get preference, so on busy lines, businesses paying for higher SLAs get prefered over regular consumers who might shunted off to a lower grade connection where there's space. It's worth noting that SEA-ME-WE-3 is administered by Singtel there are 90+ other investors (who were all getting preference or had capacity agreements at launch). ASC has over 10 times the capacity (60Tbit/s) of SEA-ME-WE-3 which was below 1 Tbit/s until 2009 and is not only 4.6 Tbit/s according to wiki. SEA-ME-WE-3, the cable you were talking about was the only game in town for that side of the country until about 4 years ago when ASC came online. Something that wasn't mentioned was that this is why traders will pay millions to set up servers in DCs/IXs all the way between them and the market so they have more control over the route their traffic takes. After your request leaves your ISPs hardware often you have no choice where it goes next. It's a mix of traffic, peering agreements between providers* and QoS rules on the routers you hop through along the way. >Sometimes I get weird routing through Asia if a service determines I'm better suited for that. But they couldn't do anything about the sharks :(.
Luckily this was a well known risk/issue for our parent company who had a team dedicated to negotiating peering and routing between office locations and their nearest regional DCs (these were not azure, aws, etc. If the primary sub-sea cable was cut, we'd have to route through another which would add at least 400ms round trip extra. The answer was usually "illegal fishing", or "sharks".
We had ridiculous bandwidth for the time, which users knew, and they would often come and ask "why can I stream youtube in HD but accessing my document/file takes ages" (ages being anything more than 2-3 seconds). No data at rest (besides riverbed cache) due to security. locally we had firewall, router, riverbed, UPS that's it for max 40 people. I never really appreciated the relationship and importance of bandwidth, latency and packet loss until I had to move a small office from all on-prem infrastructure to completely cloud based at a regional data centre, about 10 years ago.
0 kommentar(er)
